No where has the feminist fight with the male power model been more apparent than in the U.S. Military.

The Military has and will continue to be most appropriate target for feminist rage, because it is the icon of male power. All of the services are now so entirely committed to providing a place for females in every facet of military operations that it has entirely forgotten common sense. The best example of this phenomenon is the death of a Navy female fighter pilot while attempting to land on an aircraft carrier a few years ago.

The Navy fighter pilot is considered the macho of the macho, the men of men. Watch the movie Top Gun (which is one of the few movies that came close to an accurate view of this type of lifestyle). These are arrogant, self centered, macho men and the Navy wants them that way.

It was therefore fitting that having a female fighter pilot would naturally be high on the checklist of feminists wanting to break down "barriers of male power". The cost, unfortunately was the death of a female and the loss of a 20 million dollar aircraft.

The woman had absolutely no business being in the cockpit (sounds powerfully male doesn't it? cockpit?) of that aircraft. She was in that cockpit because the Navy was told that they had better get them a female fighter pilot, but quick, to prove that the Navy was committed to equal opportunity.

Now, there are those that would ask "couldn't she have become qualified on her own, because she was a god pilot?? This might have been true but I seriously doubt it.

The Navy pilot program is a hard fraternity to break into. Landing an aircraft on a carrier at sea has got to rank as one of the most difficult occupations anywhere.

All of the candidates must undergo an extensive training program that is specifically designed to get rid of the majority of candidates in order to select only the top people.

The fighter pilot is at the top of the top of the list. The "wash-out" rate is very high.

Lets say you take 100 white males. By the time basic flight in Pensacola is complete, the list is down to 50. By Advanced flight school the number drops to about 40. OF these 40 only about 10 will be picked to fly fighters (as opposed to bombers, helicopters, transport planes etc) Once out of school, more are dropped from the program for various reasons. Some cannot take the stress of long deployments. The number may in many cases get down to 6 actual fighter pilots out of the original 100.

Now, if 94 white male candidates could not become qualified as a fighter pilot, what are the chances of a female candidate, who makes up less than 1% of the 100 original candidates, of becoming qualified all the way through the program. Pretty slim I would say. There are just too many dis-qualifiers.

I submit that this female had help and lots of it. This is where the military has lost the ball. The standards would have had to be lowered and strings pulled for this lady to succeed in the way the Navy wanted her to succeed. This is what is dangerous.

There many other examples of this too numerous to go into now. My point is that fear by the military brass of feminism, coupled with the news media's naturally liberal animosity towards it, has driven it to make bad decisions all in the name of equality for women. But, by God, the barriers of male power are coming down!!!! Lets celebrate!!!

Skip to next entry or continue with my reply.
I find your claims on the subject both interesting and dubious. I am not sure that the feminist fight has been most vociferous in the military realm. On the contrary, I think there is some ambiguity in this area because some feminists do not wish to commit themselves to asserting that women need to get into the military. In a feminist society there would in principle be peace. Others just want women in positions of leadership so that they can send men to their death in large numbers.

However the case that you mention of the woman that died also leaves some questions. Was she genuinely less qualified than male pilots. You provide no actual evidence to support the claim though I am sympathetic to the possibility. However ultimately, what position do you want to take about female participation in the military? While women may generally be weaker than men and be relatively unsuited to hand-to-hand combat, they would seem to be, in the long run, quite suited to being pilots and operating machinery of mass destruction or performing engineering tasks. However I agree that the fanatical devotion to obtaining symbolic results has put women into positions, at times, for which they were not sufficiently competent. Victims of the war.